Rose Frantzen at the Palette and Chisel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74fe3/74fe32a09b6a165c042b5e178ecc9bf8ed702f01" alt=""
I posted these pictures of Rose Frantzen's show over to our Palette blog a few weeks ago -- but as I've been thinking about the paintings that she just put up last weekend-- I just have to offer commentary too -- because -- well -- she is so remarkable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab532/ab5321d06c28e1baf653fe34f1bfe7606a8735b5" alt=""
For what seems like the first time ever at a P&C show --- I walked into the gallery room and got knocked flat -- with a blast of energy from the heartland (Maquoqueta, Iowa, to be exact) -- and as I reflected on what she was doing -- I realized that she's just telling us about her life -- as in a well-made first-person novel or docu-drama.
She titled the show "A look at life" -- and yes -- that's quite accurate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b14/d8b142dd2c01cab39300951fc7f4564284fe3e96" alt=""
No attempt at meeting any expectations of formal portraiture here -- just the presentation of somebody local -- but so powerfully present -- as to recall those 15th C. portaits of Italian warlords.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1749a/1749a33f754058143dbf966ffaa1e40285d4f3f0" alt=""
And when she makes a landscape (this is someplace on Staten Island, as I recall) -- there's this sense of impending action -- like it's not just a pretty scene -- but it's a setting where things have happened and will happen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdcb1/fdcb1b39c4f7111ceb55ad529196518867eaaeb8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83e12/83e12b4e2de3f1666c86067d2ed97e987ba7814a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f60b/2f60b29ed58b4725aa88337eb1f0245c447b859a" alt=""
If you've seen a Richard Schmid floral -- you'll know where these florals come from -- but there's no harm -- in my oriental aesthetics -- in reliving the past -- because beauty is not dulled by repetition -- and the spirit in each painting is a unique event.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bba9b/bba9bc981538d7ac4d3f9a39ed3e82ebdca7774b" alt=""
But, for me, the most charming part of the exhibition were the paintings of her parents -- as she really became something of a documentary film maker -- which is, I think, quite a technical achievement for a painter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eafcd/eafcd7586604b11e0c46697b9658bdabfa69d6e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a5fd/4a5fdfb77f8082870149f2c10b043471468fd622" alt=""
These two paintings show her parents reacting to newpaper reports of events in the Middle East, where one of her brothers was then stationed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af0a9/af0a90687a113e723711f5ee7b8d3b5aee9a1f60" alt=""
But now we come to the part of the show that flew way over my head -- this almost religious icon to woman-as-mother....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00ca0/00ca05f4c6ab246026af55d8e1d0cef3df8939e7" alt=""
...and I feel like I've walked into some strange church to which I don't belong
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/368c1/368c149099ba440f84c27e01b2a5d793a1c888b3" alt=""
Maybe it's just that, being a childless drone, I just can't relate to the thrills of procreation (which -- when opportunity ever arose -- I carefully tried to avoid)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73934/73934464678ac0101ece52eaf0dba95a1aca0a54" alt=""
But even in these incomprehensible paintings--- the details were so true and so enjoyable -- I remain captivated by them.
Yes -- it was just like going to a good movie -- some scenes I liked -- some I couldn't figure out -- and walking out of the theatre onto the street -- I just have to start talking about what I've seen.
5 Comments:
I had just enough time for a quick trip to the Palette & Chisel... I especially like the paintings of Frantzen's parents.
When I looked at the first of what you call "icons" of woman, what flew into my head was Ford Madox Brown's "Take Your Son, Sir." I suppose it's the frontal pose with uplifted chin and the two important circles, similarly placed, that made the link--and I bet that a feminist art historian could have a very great deal to say about each.
The central baby-and-flower-embracing swimmer in the last picture also has something of that strange mixture of external (baby held out) and internal (ravel of cloth like a womb around the baby) that's in the FMB picture. The babies here are roughly womb-level and also surrounded, here by flowers.
That one feels rather pre-Raphaelite in other ways, too, all that infinite fluidity of mingled water and drapery--only a good p-R would metamorphose them into water nymphs trying to drown Hylas, I suppose.
That's both of my two cents in the Chris hat. Back to work! But I enjoyed my jaunt.
Turning to Wikipedia for the four early declarations of the Pre Rapahelite Brotherhood:
1. To have genuine ideas to express;
2. To study Nature attentively, so as to know how to express them;
3. To sympathise with what is direct and serious and heartfelt in previous art, to the exclusion of what is conventional and self-parading and learned by rote;
4. And, most indispensable of all, to produce thoroughly good pictures and statues.
Yes--- I think that Rose could put the PRB initials into the corner of her "icon" paintings -- and while these all appear to be good principles -- actually -- I think they're a prescription for bad painting:
#1 turns painting into illustration, #2 makes it slave to Nature, #3 attacks convention - which enables mastery, #4 "thoroughly good" is boring
Well -- I suppose those brief responses of mine are hardly self-evident -- but I feel a need to keep them short -- and needless to say, I've never seen a PRB painting that I've liked.
And, thankyou again, Marly, for your perceptive responses. As others have noted, every blog has its ideal reader , I think you're pretty close to being mine.
Aw, Chris! Nothing like a compliment to shut me up . . . if only one could shut up a writer.
I think it is interesting and a little funny that you don’t like the Brotherhood. I’d certainly run away if I saw one of the men coming after me—they were so good at scattering misery among their womenfolk. And poor William Morris: he should have known the perfect pre-Raphaelite model would make a lousy sort of wife.
Long, long ago I felt a sort of fascination with them, and read the poems of Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Christina Rossetti and William Morris. But I feel a lot of sympathy for your rejection of their ideas. It’s the same with words; start with an idea and plan to embed it or embody it, and you’ve deadened what you try to make. The idea about studying nature also has a parallel: the danger, particularly in poetry, of locking yourself into mere lovely decoration. I’d take almost the same lesson from numbers 3 and 4, and I’d add that 3—in a painting or in words—leads straight to the humorless, and leaves out the great comedy of life.
Of course, I’ve never tacked up a manifesto. If I did, I’d start to disagree with it immediately.
too bad that you don't understand some of the paintings-the 3 babies and 3 mothers was in tribute to the artists two brothers babies and her best friend-all within 24 hours. Its a painting of a mother nuturing, a mother dreaming about what her child will be someday and a mother letting go-these are 3 aspects of being a mother-
Thanks for filling in the backstory.
There are so many sacred mothers in the world, I just assumed that this was another shrine.
(and even if it's not -- it could be!)
Post a Comment
<< Home